Editor's Note

Less formality, thank you!

There is too much ceremony in Zambia. Roll out the red carpet! Don’t talk bad of the president! Address all ministers as ‘honourable’! Crawl for the chiefs! Respect your elders! I know it is part of customs and traditions in Zambia, but it is holding the country back. Formality creates barriers, and makes us forget that we are all human beings. Ceremony reinforces the feeling of ‘us’ and ‘them’, and makes us believe that some people are better than others. The president and his train of ministers and other VIPs are no better than you and I. They are simply humans with as many strengths and faults as the rest of us. Why, then, does everybody have to bow and scrape for them? Why can’t they be approached on a human-to-human level? When society is riddled with hierarchical segregation, as is the case in Zambia, it slows down development. Ceremony is one reason why Zambia is struggling to develop, as we seemingly accept that some people are more deserving than others.

Camilla Hebo Buus, Editor Zambia Weekly
  • justice
  • communication

Internet censorship exists in Zambia

An analysis of internet censorship in three African countries shows that the practice does indeed exist in Zambia. However, it READ MORE...
  • business

No more employment permits!

Government has suspended the renewal of employment permits for expatriates until further notice. Minister of Home Affairs Stephen Kampyongo explained READ MORE...
  • agriculture

Locusts ARE on the move

The area under attack from locusts in Central Province is increasing. The Times of Zambia reported at the beginning of READ MORE...
  • communication

Third satellite TV network launched

Africa’s newest satellite network, Kwesé TV, is now available in Zambia, turning up the heat under DStv/Multichoice, which is already READ MORE...

This Week’s Exchange

Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy and international development, Birmingham University, UK, stated:

“Until now, Zambia’s progress under multi-party politics has been quietly impressive. Over the last year, though, things have changed. (…) According to the Conference of Catholic Bishops – one of the most influential bodies in the country – Zambia doesn’t deserve to be called a democracy (…) it has become a dictatorship – or getting there. Many Catholic leaders were seen to be sympathetic to the PF, when it won power under Michael Sata in 2011, so what has changed? This is not the first time that a Zambian president has sought to consolidate his authority by manipulating state institutions. Nor is it the first time that opposition leaders have been arrested, or civil society groups intimidated. In the recent past, these moments of high political tension have often been resolved peacefully, (…) but it’s unlikely that Lungu will cede his quest to remain in office. First, key civil society groups such as the trade unions have been weakened by privatisation, informalisation and unemployment. Second, the Constitutional Court, that’s responsible for interpreting the constitution, was handpicked by Lungu. Third, Lungu’s case is more complicated than Chiluba’s. In 2001, the second president had served two full terms in office and wanted one more. Today, Lungu is arguing that he should be allowed to have a third term because his first period in office did not count, as he was just serving out the final year of Sata’s term. All of this means that Lungu is likely to get his way. (…) Opposition protests are inevitable, as is some civil society criticism. If past form is anything to go by, Lungu’s government will respond with threats and intimidation.”

Ruling PF party deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri reacted:

Cheeseman is nothing but an attention-seeking professor, who thinks he can lecture us about democracy. The people of Zambia spoke through the vote, and their wishes must be respected by all, including Cheeseman. Cheeseman creates the impression that there was a letter authored by all Catholic bishops, which labelled Zambia as a dictatorship. For the record, that was an opinion expressed by the archbishop. (…) It is irresponsible for Cheeseman to compare ours with late President Frederick Chiluba’s third-term bid. The view that the current constitution allows President Lungu to seek re-election (…) is before the courts of law. (…) the PF will respect the outcome of the court system. President Lungu’s good governance record remains solid. It was President Lungu’s administration that took the referendum on the proposed Bill of Rights to the people. (…) it was UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema who campaigned against it. It is President Lungu’s administration, which allowed for the 50%+1 clause in the constitution, the running mate clause, and reduction of presidential powers. President Lungu believes in an independent judiciary. (…) Today, Zambia has a Constitutional Court, something that was unheard of in the history of our nation. While the opposition petitioned the Constitutional Court, President Lungu remained calm until the matter expired. We wish to correct the view that human rights of politicians in trouble with the law are being violated. Citizens, who are also politicians, and on trial, have appeared in court within a week of being charged, and (…) for continued trial. The due process of the law is clearly being followed to the letter. Professor Cheeseman‘s daydream, that Zambia is falling from grace because of HH’s arrest, is a lie. Zambia remains a shining example of democracy not only on the African continent but world over.”