Editor's Note

Pseudo-democracy is not good enough!

Was 2016 a good year for democracy in Zambia? Government would say ‘yes!’ The opposition would say ‘no!’ Former US president Lincoln famously said that democracy was “government of the people, by the people, [and] for the people”. The definitions of ‘of’, ‘by’ and ‘for’ have been discussed ever since, but no matter how one looks at it, democracy is about people, and in this context we are talking common people! The question is whether or not our government is about common people? First of all, our government is not made of the common people, since it only includes people with a Grade 12 certificate. Neither is it made by the common people, judging from the many reports of irregularities during this year’s elections. The opposition was demonised, harassed and arrested, the biggest government-critical newspaper was closed, and there were reports of rigging. And our government is definitely not made for the common people, as our law-makers seem more concerned with how many houses, cars and allowances they can amass. Zambia may be better off than many other African countries, and some people believe that ‘big man democracy’ is exactly what the masses need. I disagree! Zambia has held regular so-called democratic elections since independence, but without its democracy becoming visibly more democratic. We can definitely do better than this pseudo-democracy in 2017!


camilla
Camilla Hebo Buus, Editor Zambia Weekly
  • politics

2016 | 3 | UPND denied trial

3 of 10 | Biggest events in 2016: The dismissal of the UPND’s election petition without trial stands out as one of READ MORE...
  • justice

2016 | 4 | New Constitution!

4 of 10 | Biggest events in 2016: On 5 January 2016, President Lungu presided over a historic event, when READ MORE...

This Week’s Exchange

Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy and international development, Birmingham University, UK, stated:

“Until now, Zambia’s progress under multi-party politics has been quietly impressive. Over the last year, though, things have changed. (…) According to the Conference of Catholic Bishops – one of the most influential bodies in the country – Zambia doesn’t deserve to be called a democracy (…) it has become a dictatorship – or getting there. Many Catholic leaders were seen to be sympathetic to the PF, when it won power under Michael Sata in 2011, so what has changed? This is not the first time that a Zambian president has sought to consolidate his authority by manipulating state institutions. Nor is it the first time that opposition leaders have been arrested, or civil society groups intimidated. In the recent past, these moments of high political tension have often been resolved peacefully, (…) but it’s unlikely that Lungu will cede his quest to remain in office. First, key civil society groups such as the trade unions have been weakened by privatisation, informalisation and unemployment. Second, the Constitutional Court, that’s responsible for interpreting the constitution, was handpicked by Lungu. Third, Lungu’s case is more complicated than Chiluba’s. In 2001, the second president had served two full terms in office and wanted one more. Today, Lungu is arguing that he should be allowed to have a third term because his first period in office did not count, as he was just serving out the final year of Sata’s term. All of this means that Lungu is likely to get his way. (…) Opposition protests are inevitable, as is some civil society criticism. If past form is anything to go by, Lungu’s government will respond with threats and intimidation.”

Ruling PF party deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri reacted:

Cheeseman is nothing but an attention-seeking professor, who thinks he can lecture us about democracy. The people of Zambia spoke through the vote, and their wishes must be respected by all, including Cheeseman. Cheeseman creates the impression that there was a letter authored by all Catholic bishops, which labelled Zambia as a dictatorship. For the record, that was an opinion expressed by the archbishop. (…) It is irresponsible for Cheeseman to compare ours with late President Frederick Chiluba’s third-term bid. The view that the current constitution allows President Lungu to seek re-election (…) is before the courts of law. (…) the PF will respect the outcome of the court system. President Lungu’s good governance record remains solid. It was President Lungu’s administration that took the referendum on the proposed Bill of Rights to the people. (…) it was UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema who campaigned against it. It is President Lungu’s administration, which allowed for the 50%+1 clause in the constitution, the running mate clause, and reduction of presidential powers. President Lungu believes in an independent judiciary. (…) Today, Zambia has a Constitutional Court, something that was unheard of in the history of our nation. While the opposition petitioned the Constitutional Court, President Lungu remained calm until the matter expired. We wish to correct the view that human rights of politicians in trouble with the law are being violated. Citizens, who are also politicians, and on trial, have appeared in court within a week of being charged, and (…) for continued trial. The due process of the law is clearly being followed to the letter. Professor Cheeseman‘s daydream, that Zambia is falling from grace because of HH’s arrest, is a lie. Zambia remains a shining example of democracy not only on the African continent but world over.”