Editor's Note

It’s good that only a few pass the law exams!

Only 6.7% of this year’s law students passed their final examination to be allowed to practice law. The news gave rise to the same complaints about elitism as seen every year as far back as I can remember. However, I think the appalling result is excellent news! Who wants mediocre students to become mediocre lawyers to become mediocre judges? The judiciary in Zambia is mediocre enough as it is, inspiring little trust in the large part of the population without money, connections and/or influence. Last year, when the same debate raged, the gatekeeper, the Zambia Institute of Advanced Legal Education (ZIALE), defended itself by pointing a finger at the quality of the entire education system. And it is right. ZIALE should never be forced to lower its standard. Zambia should instead be forced to raise its educational standards. This would not only help our lawyers, but also our engineers, accountants, teachers, doctors, journalists, bankers and all the other professions that are marked by a shortage in terms of both quality and quantity.

Camilla Hebo Buus, Editor Zambia Weekly
  • infrastructure

Five-day blackout in five provinces

Large parts of five provinces – Northern, Luapula, Muchinga, Eastern and Central – have been in darkness for five days READ MORE...
  • politics
  • money

Lungu’s salary to be halved

President Lungu has decided to cut his monthly salary by 50% in these times of austerity. Many hailed the move, READ MORE...
  • politics

Elections not free and fair?

The European Union (EU) recently released its final report on Zambia’s general elections in August 2016. The EU refrains from READ MORE...
  • infrastructure

First mini-hydro grid established

The construction of Zambia’s first ever mini-hydro grid is about to begin. The hydropower station at Kasanjiku Falls on Kasanjiku READ MORE...
  • justice

Government kills IT specialist?

Chilomba Chitiya, 32, an IT employee at Airtel, has been found dead in Chilenje, Lusaka, hours after he told his READ MORE...

This Week’s Exchange

Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy and international development, Birmingham University, UK, stated:

“Until now, Zambia’s progress under multi-party politics has been quietly impressive. Over the last year, though, things have changed. (…) According to the Conference of Catholic Bishops – one of the most influential bodies in the country – Zambia doesn’t deserve to be called a democracy (…) it has become a dictatorship – or getting there. Many Catholic leaders were seen to be sympathetic to the PF, when it won power under Michael Sata in 2011, so what has changed? This is not the first time that a Zambian president has sought to consolidate his authority by manipulating state institutions. Nor is it the first time that opposition leaders have been arrested, or civil society groups intimidated. In the recent past, these moments of high political tension have often been resolved peacefully, (…) but it’s unlikely that Lungu will cede his quest to remain in office. First, key civil society groups such as the trade unions have been weakened by privatisation, informalisation and unemployment. Second, the Constitutional Court, that’s responsible for interpreting the constitution, was handpicked by Lungu. Third, Lungu’s case is more complicated than Chiluba’s. In 2001, the second president had served two full terms in office and wanted one more. Today, Lungu is arguing that he should be allowed to have a third term because his first period in office did not count, as he was just serving out the final year of Sata’s term. All of this means that Lungu is likely to get his way. (…) Opposition protests are inevitable, as is some civil society criticism. If past form is anything to go by, Lungu’s government will respond with threats and intimidation.”

Ruling PF party deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri reacted:

Cheeseman is nothing but an attention-seeking professor, who thinks he can lecture us about democracy. The people of Zambia spoke through the vote, and their wishes must be respected by all, including Cheeseman. Cheeseman creates the impression that there was a letter authored by all Catholic bishops, which labelled Zambia as a dictatorship. For the record, that was an opinion expressed by the archbishop. (…) It is irresponsible for Cheeseman to compare ours with late President Frederick Chiluba’s third-term bid. The view that the current constitution allows President Lungu to seek re-election (…) is before the courts of law. (…) the PF will respect the outcome of the court system. President Lungu’s good governance record remains solid. It was President Lungu’s administration that took the referendum on the proposed Bill of Rights to the people. (…) it was UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema who campaigned against it. It is President Lungu’s administration, which allowed for the 50%+1 clause in the constitution, the running mate clause, and reduction of presidential powers. President Lungu believes in an independent judiciary. (…) Today, Zambia has a Constitutional Court, something that was unheard of in the history of our nation. While the opposition petitioned the Constitutional Court, President Lungu remained calm until the matter expired. We wish to correct the view that human rights of politicians in trouble with the law are being violated. Citizens, who are also politicians, and on trial, have appeared in court within a week of being charged, and (…) for continued trial. The due process of the law is clearly being followed to the letter. Professor Cheeseman‘s daydream, that Zambia is falling from grace because of HH’s arrest, is a lie. Zambia remains a shining example of democracy not only on the African continent but world over.”