Editor's Note

Is the Christian declaration doing Zambia any good?

I have just finished reading an interesting thesis from 2002 about the late President Chiluba’s push to make Zambia a Christian nation. The thesis reached the conclusion that Zambia could not be said to be a Christian nation for a lot of reasons, including, paramount, that a nation cannot be Christian by proclamation, but by the lifestyles of individuals who call themselves Christians. President Lungu has gone to great length to reinvigorate the Christian nation declaration by creating a new public holiday (National Prayer Day), initiating the construction of a new interdenominational mega-church (House of Prayers) and now by considering a Ministry of Religious Affairs. However, I am not sure this makes Zambia any more Christian than other nations? Otherwise, I find it difficult to explain the widespread immorality in Zambia. Just look at the poverty, the defilements, the gender-based violence, the political violence and the corruption. I find it difficult to reconcile this with Christian principles.

Camilla Hebo Buus, Editor Zambia Weekly
  • politics

The churches put their foot down

The three church mother bodies (the Council of Churches in Zambia, the Evangelical Fellowship of Zambia and the Zambia Episcopal READ MORE...
  • politics

More women in parliament

The new parliament counts 26 women amongst its 156 elected members, equivalent to 16.7%, the highest ever seen in Zambia, READ MORE...
  • environment

Partial solar eclipse in Zambia

Zambia experienced a partial solar eclipse on 1 September. The full eclipse was visible from Central Africa and Madagascar (see READ MORE...
  • communication

Closed media houses sue the State

Muvi TV and Komboni Radio have sued the State over the suspension of their broadcasting licenses. On 22 August, the READ MORE...
  • politics

Is this why Lungu won?

Despite overseeing clear economic decline since taking over as president in January 2015, Edgar Lungu (PF) officially won the recent READ MORE...
  • living

New Ministry of Religious Affairs?

President Lungu has suggested re-introducing a “Ministry of Christianity or Ministry of Religious Affairs or something like that” to reinforce READ MORE...

This Week’s Exchange

Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy and international development, Birmingham University, UK, stated:

“Until now, Zambia’s progress under multi-party politics has been quietly impressive. Over the last year, though, things have changed. (…) According to the Conference of Catholic Bishops – one of the most influential bodies in the country – Zambia doesn’t deserve to be called a democracy (…) it has become a dictatorship – or getting there. Many Catholic leaders were seen to be sympathetic to the PF, when it won power under Michael Sata in 2011, so what has changed? This is not the first time that a Zambian president has sought to consolidate his authority by manipulating state institutions. Nor is it the first time that opposition leaders have been arrested, or civil society groups intimidated. In the recent past, these moments of high political tension have often been resolved peacefully, (…) but it’s unlikely that Lungu will cede his quest to remain in office. First, key civil society groups such as the trade unions have been weakened by privatisation, informalisation and unemployment. Second, the Constitutional Court, that’s responsible for interpreting the constitution, was handpicked by Lungu. Third, Lungu’s case is more complicated than Chiluba’s. In 2001, the second president had served two full terms in office and wanted one more. Today, Lungu is arguing that he should be allowed to have a third term because his first period in office did not count, as he was just serving out the final year of Sata’s term. All of this means that Lungu is likely to get his way. (…) Opposition protests are inevitable, as is some civil society criticism. If past form is anything to go by, Lungu’s government will respond with threats and intimidation.”

Ruling PF party deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri reacted:

Cheeseman is nothing but an attention-seeking professor, who thinks he can lecture us about democracy. The people of Zambia spoke through the vote, and their wishes must be respected by all, including Cheeseman. Cheeseman creates the impression that there was a letter authored by all Catholic bishops, which labelled Zambia as a dictatorship. For the record, that was an opinion expressed by the archbishop. (…) It is irresponsible for Cheeseman to compare ours with late President Frederick Chiluba’s third-term bid. The view that the current constitution allows President Lungu to seek re-election (…) is before the courts of law. (…) the PF will respect the outcome of the court system. President Lungu’s good governance record remains solid. It was President Lungu’s administration that took the referendum on the proposed Bill of Rights to the people. (…) it was UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema who campaigned against it. It is President Lungu’s administration, which allowed for the 50%+1 clause in the constitution, the running mate clause, and reduction of presidential powers. President Lungu believes in an independent judiciary. (…) Today, Zambia has a Constitutional Court, something that was unheard of in the history of our nation. While the opposition petitioned the Constitutional Court, President Lungu remained calm until the matter expired. We wish to correct the view that human rights of politicians in trouble with the law are being violated. Citizens, who are also politicians, and on trial, have appeared in court within a week of being charged, and (…) for continued trial. The due process of the law is clearly being followed to the letter. Professor Cheeseman‘s daydream, that Zambia is falling from grace because of HH’s arrest, is a lie. Zambia remains a shining example of democracy not only on the African continent but world over.”