Editor's Note

A prolonged political crisis is the last thing we need

 

While we are all following the proceedings in the courtroom, eager to find out whether or not the election of president Edgar Lungu was rigged, the country has come to a standstill. A president, who is but a president-re-elect suspended between terms in office, means very few decisions are being made. And the great loser in this political hullaballoo is the economy. Zambia’s economy was finally beginning to show signs of at the very least stabilising, following a tumultuous tailspin, but it is going to take a lot more to make it soar again. Zambia is in desperate need of some decisive economic decision-making to pave the way for budget support, sooner rather than later, probably from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), although some people are hoping that the Chinese will step in, in order to avoid IMF’s harsh austerity measures. Let’s hope the court drama will be resolved fast. A drawn-out political crisis is the last thing we need right now. Otherwise, the economy will tank.


camilla
Camilla Hebo Buus, Editor Zambia Weekly
  • communication

Muvi TV shut down

The potentially misnamed Independent Broadcasting Authority (IBA), which in actual fact is controlled by government through executive appointments, suspended broadcasting READ MORE...
  • justice

Is it ethnic cleansing?

About 150 people have been displaced in Maala in Namwala District, Southern Province, by suspected UPND supporters. The latter allegedly READ MORE...
  • justice

Should Lungu have been sworn in?

President Lungu was not sworn in on 23 August, as planned, due to the opposition UPND party petitioning the result READ MORE...
  • justice

ECZ removes 8,000 votes for Lungu

When the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) announced the results for Lundazi Constituency in Eastern Province on 15 August, it READ MORE...
  • money

Inflation drops to 19.6%

The annual inflation rate dropped to 19.6% in August 2016, down from 20.2% in July. The inflation has been steadily READ MORE...

This Week’s Exchange

Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy and international development, Birmingham University, UK, stated:

“Until now, Zambia’s progress under multi-party politics has been quietly impressive. Over the last year, though, things have changed. (…) According to the Conference of Catholic Bishops – one of the most influential bodies in the country – Zambia doesn’t deserve to be called a democracy (…) it has become a dictatorship – or getting there. Many Catholic leaders were seen to be sympathetic to the PF, when it won power under Michael Sata in 2011, so what has changed? This is not the first time that a Zambian president has sought to consolidate his authority by manipulating state institutions. Nor is it the first time that opposition leaders have been arrested, or civil society groups intimidated. In the recent past, these moments of high political tension have often been resolved peacefully, (…) but it’s unlikely that Lungu will cede his quest to remain in office. First, key civil society groups such as the trade unions have been weakened by privatisation, informalisation and unemployment. Second, the Constitutional Court, that’s responsible for interpreting the constitution, was handpicked by Lungu. Third, Lungu’s case is more complicated than Chiluba’s. In 2001, the second president had served two full terms in office and wanted one more. Today, Lungu is arguing that he should be allowed to have a third term because his first period in office did not count, as he was just serving out the final year of Sata’s term. All of this means that Lungu is likely to get his way. (…) Opposition protests are inevitable, as is some civil society criticism. If past form is anything to go by, Lungu’s government will respond with threats and intimidation.”

Ruling PF party deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri reacted:

Cheeseman is nothing but an attention-seeking professor, who thinks he can lecture us about democracy. The people of Zambia spoke through the vote, and their wishes must be respected by all, including Cheeseman. Cheeseman creates the impression that there was a letter authored by all Catholic bishops, which labelled Zambia as a dictatorship. For the record, that was an opinion expressed by the archbishop. (…) It is irresponsible for Cheeseman to compare ours with late President Frederick Chiluba’s third-term bid. The view that the current constitution allows President Lungu to seek re-election (…) is before the courts of law. (…) the PF will respect the outcome of the court system. President Lungu’s good governance record remains solid. It was President Lungu’s administration that took the referendum on the proposed Bill of Rights to the people. (…) it was UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema who campaigned against it. It is President Lungu’s administration, which allowed for the 50%+1 clause in the constitution, the running mate clause, and reduction of presidential powers. President Lungu believes in an independent judiciary. (…) Today, Zambia has a Constitutional Court, something that was unheard of in the history of our nation. While the opposition petitioned the Constitutional Court, President Lungu remained calm until the matter expired. We wish to correct the view that human rights of politicians in trouble with the law are being violated. Citizens, who are also politicians, and on trial, have appeared in court within a week of being charged, and (…) for continued trial. The due process of the law is clearly being followed to the letter. Professor Cheeseman‘s daydream, that Zambia is falling from grace because of HH’s arrest, is a lie. Zambia remains a shining example of democracy not only on the African continent but world over.”