Editor's Note

What campaign promises have been fulfilled?

PF campaign promisesAs we are fast approaching this year’s general elections – with parliament being dissolved this week and the campaign period starting next week – it is prudent to remember that we are about to be flooded with lots of promises from aspiring politicians. To help our readers remain grounded, Zambia Weekly has compiled an overview of some of the PF government’s biggest campaign promises from the last general elections in Zambia in 2011. It clearly shows that promises are easier to make than keep. It would be refreshing if we could stick to reality in this year’s elections.


camilla
Camilla Hebo Buus, Editor Zambia Weekly
  • infrastructure

Riots in Chisekesi

People in Chisekesi south of Monze in Southern Province have rioted for two days after a motorist drove off after READ MORE...
  • justice

Police tear-gas refugees

Police have apparently tear-gassed about 60 Congolese people at Kazungula Border Post in an effort to prevent them from trying READ MORE...
  • justice
  • development

14 UNZA students freed

The state has withdrawn a case against 14 students from the University of Zambia (UNZA) for breach of peace. The READ MORE...
  • development

CBU expels 12 students

The Copperbelt University (CBU) has expelled 12 students for rioting in line with clauses 44, 46 and 47 of the READ MORE...
  • justice

Suspected ritual killers in court

Four people have appeared in the Magistrates’ Court in Lusaka accused of being involved in the recent spare of ritual READ MORE...
  • communication

Internet users in Zambia

There are 6.1 million Internet users in Zambia, with MTN sitting on 45.5% of the data market, followed by Airtel READ MORE...
  • money

The Kwacha weakens

The Kwacha is slowly depreciating again, after having temporarily appreciated to almost breach K9 a US dollar about a month READ MORE...
  • politics
  • communication

Mumbi Phiri offends ex-First Lady

The ruling PF party’s secretary general, Mumbi Phiri, has been accused of offending relatives of the late President Sata, including READ MORE...

This Week’s Exchange

Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy and international development, Birmingham University, UK, stated:

“Until now, Zambia’s progress under multi-party politics has been quietly impressive. Over the last year, though, things have changed. (…) According to the Conference of Catholic Bishops – one of the most influential bodies in the country – Zambia doesn’t deserve to be called a democracy (…) it has become a dictatorship – or getting there. Many Catholic leaders were seen to be sympathetic to the PF, when it won power under Michael Sata in 2011, so what has changed? This is not the first time that a Zambian president has sought to consolidate his authority by manipulating state institutions. Nor is it the first time that opposition leaders have been arrested, or civil society groups intimidated. In the recent past, these moments of high political tension have often been resolved peacefully, (…) but it’s unlikely that Lungu will cede his quest to remain in office. First, key civil society groups such as the trade unions have been weakened by privatisation, informalisation and unemployment. Second, the Constitutional Court, that’s responsible for interpreting the constitution, was handpicked by Lungu. Third, Lungu’s case is more complicated than Chiluba’s. In 2001, the second president had served two full terms in office and wanted one more. Today, Lungu is arguing that he should be allowed to have a third term because his first period in office did not count, as he was just serving out the final year of Sata’s term. All of this means that Lungu is likely to get his way. (…) Opposition protests are inevitable, as is some civil society criticism. If past form is anything to go by, Lungu’s government will respond with threats and intimidation.”

Ruling PF party deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri reacted:

Cheeseman is nothing but an attention-seeking professor, who thinks he can lecture us about democracy. The people of Zambia spoke through the vote, and their wishes must be respected by all, including Cheeseman. Cheeseman creates the impression that there was a letter authored by all Catholic bishops, which labelled Zambia as a dictatorship. For the record, that was an opinion expressed by the archbishop. (…) It is irresponsible for Cheeseman to compare ours with late President Frederick Chiluba’s third-term bid. The view that the current constitution allows President Lungu to seek re-election (…) is before the courts of law. (…) the PF will respect the outcome of the court system. President Lungu’s good governance record remains solid. It was President Lungu’s administration that took the referendum on the proposed Bill of Rights to the people. (…) it was UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema who campaigned against it. It is President Lungu’s administration, which allowed for the 50%+1 clause in the constitution, the running mate clause, and reduction of presidential powers. President Lungu believes in an independent judiciary. (…) Today, Zambia has a Constitutional Court, something that was unheard of in the history of our nation. While the opposition petitioned the Constitutional Court, President Lungu remained calm until the matter expired. We wish to correct the view that human rights of politicians in trouble with the law are being violated. Citizens, who are also politicians, and on trial, have appeared in court within a week of being charged, and (…) for continued trial. The due process of the law is clearly being followed to the letter. Professor Cheeseman‘s daydream, that Zambia is falling from grace because of HH’s arrest, is a lie. Zambia remains a shining example of democracy not only on the African continent but world over.”