Editor's Note

Chiefs are a highly un-democratic concept

I find chiefs a puzzling concept. Here we are in a democratic country – at least government likes to call us that – and at the same time we have chiefs who have been holding on to their thrones for decades, 20, 30, 40, 50 and even 60 years! Their regime is highly autocratic. Not a hint of an election in sight! Either, chiefs inherit the throne, or they are chosen by a council of elders, leaving the whole process wide open to abuse. Yet, they reign supreme in their local communities, disregarding the principle of separation of legislative, executive and judicial powers, as they make, effect and interpret the rules. As such they constitute a parallel system to government, albeit at the local level. However, they are useful to government, as they serve as a convenient way to influence the electorate.

Camilla Hebo Buus, Editor Zambia Weekly
  • mining

Miners turn to agriculture

Government has transferred 4,000 retrenched miners into agriculture, giving them land, Vice-President Inonge Wina told the Daily Mail. Last year, READ MORE...
  • justice

K40,000 fine for illegal help

Frank Mukupa of Kitwe has been fined K40,000 for helping a Congolese, Kasongo Buari, illegally enter Zambia, reported the Times READ MORE...
  • justice

46 Ethiopians arrested

Police have arrested 6 Zambians in 2 different incidents for aiding in trafficking of a total of 46 Ethiopians. According READ MORE...
  • politics
  • justice

PF cadres beat up UPND cadres

Cadres of the ruling PF party have beaten up cadres of the opposition UPND party in Sinda, Eastern Province, leaving READ MORE...
  • politics
  • justice

21 UPND cadres arrested for rioting

Twenty-one cadres of the opposition UPND party have been arrested in Choma for rioting for unspecified reasons. The cadres were READ MORE...
  • government

All dates set for 2016 elections

The Electoral Commission of Zambia has set the dates for the tripartite election on 11 August 2016 (see table). On READ MORE...
  • politics

Miles Sampa launches DF party

PF Matero MP Miles Sampa has acknowledged that the new Democratic Front (DF) is his party, putting an end to READ MORE...

This Week’s Exchange

Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy and international development, Birmingham University, UK, stated:

“Until now, Zambia’s progress under multi-party politics has been quietly impressive. Over the last year, though, things have changed. (…) According to the Conference of Catholic Bishops – one of the most influential bodies in the country – Zambia doesn’t deserve to be called a democracy (…) it has become a dictatorship – or getting there. Many Catholic leaders were seen to be sympathetic to the PF, when it won power under Michael Sata in 2011, so what has changed? This is not the first time that a Zambian president has sought to consolidate his authority by manipulating state institutions. Nor is it the first time that opposition leaders have been arrested, or civil society groups intimidated. In the recent past, these moments of high political tension have often been resolved peacefully, (…) but it’s unlikely that Lungu will cede his quest to remain in office. First, key civil society groups such as the trade unions have been weakened by privatisation, informalisation and unemployment. Second, the Constitutional Court, that’s responsible for interpreting the constitution, was handpicked by Lungu. Third, Lungu’s case is more complicated than Chiluba’s. In 2001, the second president had served two full terms in office and wanted one more. Today, Lungu is arguing that he should be allowed to have a third term because his first period in office did not count, as he was just serving out the final year of Sata’s term. All of this means that Lungu is likely to get his way. (…) Opposition protests are inevitable, as is some civil society criticism. If past form is anything to go by, Lungu’s government will respond with threats and intimidation.”

Ruling PF party deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri reacted:

Cheeseman is nothing but an attention-seeking professor, who thinks he can lecture us about democracy. The people of Zambia spoke through the vote, and their wishes must be respected by all, including Cheeseman. Cheeseman creates the impression that there was a letter authored by all Catholic bishops, which labelled Zambia as a dictatorship. For the record, that was an opinion expressed by the archbishop. (…) It is irresponsible for Cheeseman to compare ours with late President Frederick Chiluba’s third-term bid. The view that the current constitution allows President Lungu to seek re-election (…) is before the courts of law. (…) the PF will respect the outcome of the court system. President Lungu’s good governance record remains solid. It was President Lungu’s administration that took the referendum on the proposed Bill of Rights to the people. (…) it was UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema who campaigned against it. It is President Lungu’s administration, which allowed for the 50%+1 clause in the constitution, the running mate clause, and reduction of presidential powers. President Lungu believes in an independent judiciary. (…) Today, Zambia has a Constitutional Court, something that was unheard of in the history of our nation. While the opposition petitioned the Constitutional Court, President Lungu remained calm until the matter expired. We wish to correct the view that human rights of politicians in trouble with the law are being violated. Citizens, who are also politicians, and on trial, have appeared in court within a week of being charged, and (…) for continued trial. The due process of the law is clearly being followed to the letter. Professor Cheeseman‘s daydream, that Zambia is falling from grace because of HH’s arrest, is a lie. Zambia remains a shining example of democracy not only on the African continent but world over.”