Editor's Note

Editor’s note: Will the Constitutional Court give a fair trial?

The main opposition UPND party, which narrowly lost to the ruling PF party in last week’s presidential election, maintains it will petition the result. Although it keeps on postponing the date on which it will do so, thus keeping everyone guessing on whether or not it will happen, the really interesting question is if the petition will make any difference? Can the UPND expect a fair trial in the Constitutional Court? All its judges were recently handpicked and appointed by PF President Lungu. Will the judges dare to bite the hand that feeds them? Judges should, in theory, be safe from political pressure, as they can only be removed by the Judicial Complaints Commission, based on disability, incompetence, gross misconduct or bankruptcy, but is the commission acting independently? Zambia has little experience with petitions of presidential elections, but it has happened before. In February 2005, the Supreme Court agreed that the election of President Mwanawasa in December 2001 was flawed, but ruled that the irregularities did not affect the result. The UPND’s petition could thus become a true test for the judiciary.

Camilla Hebo Buus, Editor Zambia Weekly
  • justice

HH acquitted of using insulting language

Magistrate Greenwell Malumani has acquitted opposition UPND party president Hakainde Hichilema (HH) of using insulting language, ruling that the prosecution READ MORE...
  • justice

Seven men rape 71-year-old

Seven men have allegedly raped a 71-year-old woman in Luapula Province, breaking into her house while she was asleep. The READ MORE...
  • justice

Keith Mukata charged with murder

His case highlights a problem with our constitution: The police have charged UPND Chilanga MP Keith Mukata and his wife READ MORE...
  • justice

UPND MP apprehended for murder

UPND Chilanga MP Keith Mukata and his wife Charmaine Musonda have been warned and cautioned for allegedly killing a security READ MORE...
  • justice

HH sent to the High Court

The state has u-turned on its decision to hold a preliminary inquiry into the treason charge against UPND president Hakainde READ MORE...

This Week’s Exchange

Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy and international development, Birmingham University, UK, stated:

“Until now, Zambia’s progress under multi-party politics has been quietly impressive. Over the last year, though, things have changed. (…) According to the Conference of Catholic Bishops – one of the most influential bodies in the country – Zambia doesn’t deserve to be called a democracy (…) it has become a dictatorship – or getting there. Many Catholic leaders were seen to be sympathetic to the PF, when it won power under Michael Sata in 2011, so what has changed? This is not the first time that a Zambian president has sought to consolidate his authority by manipulating state institutions. Nor is it the first time that opposition leaders have been arrested, or civil society groups intimidated. In the recent past, these moments of high political tension have often been resolved peacefully, (…) but it’s unlikely that Lungu will cede his quest to remain in office. First, key civil society groups such as the trade unions have been weakened by privatisation, informalisation and unemployment. Second, the Constitutional Court, that’s responsible for interpreting the constitution, was handpicked by Lungu. Third, Lungu’s case is more complicated than Chiluba’s. In 2001, the second president had served two full terms in office and wanted one more. Today, Lungu is arguing that he should be allowed to have a third term because his first period in office did not count, as he was just serving out the final year of Sata’s term. All of this means that Lungu is likely to get his way. (…) Opposition protests are inevitable, as is some civil society criticism. If past form is anything to go by, Lungu’s government will respond with threats and intimidation.”

Ruling PF party deputy secretary general Mumbi Phiri reacted:

Cheeseman is nothing but an attention-seeking professor, who thinks he can lecture us about democracy. The people of Zambia spoke through the vote, and their wishes must be respected by all, including Cheeseman. Cheeseman creates the impression that there was a letter authored by all Catholic bishops, which labelled Zambia as a dictatorship. For the record, that was an opinion expressed by the archbishop. (…) It is irresponsible for Cheeseman to compare ours with late President Frederick Chiluba’s third-term bid. The view that the current constitution allows President Lungu to seek re-election (…) is before the courts of law. (…) the PF will respect the outcome of the court system. President Lungu’s good governance record remains solid. It was President Lungu’s administration that took the referendum on the proposed Bill of Rights to the people. (…) it was UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema who campaigned against it. It is President Lungu’s administration, which allowed for the 50%+1 clause in the constitution, the running mate clause, and reduction of presidential powers. President Lungu believes in an independent judiciary. (…) Today, Zambia has a Constitutional Court, something that was unheard of in the history of our nation. While the opposition petitioned the Constitutional Court, President Lungu remained calm until the matter expired. We wish to correct the view that human rights of politicians in trouble with the law are being violated. Citizens, who are also politicians, and on trial, have appeared in court within a week of being charged, and (…) for continued trial. The due process of the law is clearly being followed to the letter. Professor Cheeseman‘s daydream, that Zambia is falling from grace because of HH’s arrest, is a lie. Zambia remains a shining example of democracy not only on the African continent but world over.”